Albert Einstein’s brain wasn’t your average run-of-the-mill brain. It’s still around somewhere; some say it’s in a small-town doctor’s office in Kansas, in a mason jar tucked in a cardboard box behind behind a beer cooler.
One hopes the good doctor wasn’t partaking of the beer while examining patients. If that sounds far-fetched, well, Steven Levy swears it’s true. And in fact, it does appear to be true.
Most people’s brains don’t matter for much after the rest of them has left this mortal coil. Some people never really learn how to work their brain very well even while alive.
Whatever it was that sparked such a far-reaching imagination, driven by intellectual genius, will remain an unanswered question.
It wasn’t his education that led Einstein to his discovery of space, time, and the nature of light beams; it was his imagination. He was able to envision the world in ways the even today most of us can’t really imagine.
Try imagining riding alongside a beam of light and then writing down an equation that describes it. One that works. One that scientists who at first scoffed finally had to admit that it was provable reality.
Einstein seemed destined to follow his path toward relative fame, if you’ll indulge and forgive my bad pun.
He was actually a media star, and still is. His name and likeness are the very defination of the eccentric genius scientist.
It was Newton that said if he had “seen further than other men”, it was because he “stood on the shoulders of giants” – and thus became a giant himself. Einstein surely stood on these shoulders and those of others, looking beyond what anyone had dared, or could, imagine before.
It is impossible not to be intriqued and drawn not only to the work, but also the character of a man like Albert Einstein. He was a scientist-philosopher and he left behind not only his scientific vision of the universe, but also his philosophical view of the world we live in.
It’s been a little over 50 years since Einstein died, and his vision – both universal and human – are as vital today as they will be tomorrow and as they were when he first spoke them; irrespective of time.
Get it?
I’m not sure I do either, but it will be fun to try. Thus starts the next effort in the History Blog project, where the words of great humans of the past are applied to the present.
My humble attempt to climb onto the shoulders of giants and try to get a peek at what they saw.
I am sure to stumble, but I’m going to do it anyway, and announce the start of AlbertEinsteinBlog.org. I’ll have fun and I hope you may find it amusing as well.
E=mc²/2
2009 is the end of Einstein’s space-jail of time and Fraud symbol E=mc²
Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com
Time is not a structure like space to allow space-to time-back to space jumping claimed by Physicists regardless of what physicists have to say about it because Physics is a business and not necessarily science or scientific and like every business it comes with fraud and fraud is Einstein’s space-time (x, y, z, it) continuum that led to fraud symbol E=mc² and yes I am saying that 109 years of Nobel prize winners physics and physicists are all wrong and space-time physics is based on scientific fraud. When “results” expected and “No” discovery, Physicists rigged Physics for grant money since the start of the industrial revolution. Physics today is at least 51 % fraud!
r ——————>>Exp (ì w t) ———->> S=r Exp (ì wt) Nahhas’ Equation
Orbit——–>> Orbit light sensing——>> Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential
Particle —->> light sensing of moving objects———— >> Wave
Newton———>>light sensing———->> Quantum
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects
Quantum – Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
P = visual velocity = change of visual location
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
= (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
= m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
= mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
=ì mv² [1 – 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed
wt = ?/2
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 – 2 + 0)
E (visual) = -ì mc² ? mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit) If v = c
w t = ?/4
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +?] =-mc²; v = c
wt =-?/4+?ln2/2; 2? wt=-??/2 – ln2
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-??/2] Exp [ln(1/2)]=[-? (1/2)]
E (visual) = imv² (-?/2) =1/2mc² v = c
Conclusion: E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2 joenahhas1958@yahoo.com. All rights reserved.
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
E=1/2m (m v + m’ r) ² = (1/2m) (m’ r) ²; v = 0
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m’ r =mc
E=mc²/2
Einstein’s Physics Dollar Store on Campus
MIT Harvard Cal-Tech
Sponsored by NASA
Why Relativity theory is not Physics and why Einstein’s “thought” = 0
Walking the walk and talking the talk taking on all space-time confusion of physics by
MIT Harvard and Cal-Tech and all other Physics dollar stores departments
And why LHC burned itself
Visual Effects and the confusions of “Modern” physics
r ——— Light sensing of moving objects ——- S
Actual object—– Light ——— Visual object
r – ——-cosine (wt) + i sine (wt) – S = r [cosine (wt) + i sine (wt)]
Newton– Kepler’s time visual effects — Time dependent Newton
Particle ————– Visual effects ——————– Wave
Line of Sight: r cosine wt
r ——————- r cosine (wt) line of sight light aberrations
A moving object with velocity v will be visualized by
light sensing through an angle (wt);w = constant and t= time
Also, sine wt = v/c; cosine wt = ? [1-sine² (wt) = ? [1-(v/c) ²]
A visual object moving with velocity v will be seen as S
S = r [cosine (wt) + i sine (wt)] = r Exp [i wt]; Exp = Exponential
S = r [? [1-(v/c) ²] + ? (v/c)] = S x + i S y
S x = Visual along the line of sight = r [? [1-(v/c) ²]
This Equation is special relativity length contraction formula
And it is just the visual effects caused by light aberrations of a
moving object along the line of sight.
In a right angled velocity triangle A B C: Angle A = wt; angle B = 90°; Angle C = 90° -wt
AB = hypotenuse = c; BC = opposite = v; CA= adjacent = c ? [1-(v/c) ²]
You always pass failure on the way to success.
The response level to national disaster is noble but it’s a real shame that so many people take advantage of the negative situations.
I mean everytime there is an earthquake, a flood, an oil spill – there’s always a group of heartless people who rip off tax payers.
This is in response to reading that 4 of Oprah Winfreys “angels” got busted ripping off the system. Shame on them!
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtml